37% rural youth sans Internet access: Study
The Centre on Thursday told the Supreme Court that reporting a public figure’s live-in relationship would amount to violation of his privacy and defame him even though society accepted such relations these days.
Opposing a clutch of petitions seeking scrapping of the criminal law on defamation, attorney general Mukul Rohatgi told a bench headed by Justice Dipak Misra that people “had no business to make adverse comments” about a public personality.
His defence of the defamation law came a day after he contended that right to privacy was not a fundamental right in the Constitution.
Read More
अन्य कहानियां